Воздушные детки
Sep. 16th, 2005 09:50 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
marusjaТак, по поводу рождённых в самолётах детей, пока все не переругались окончательно.
Ссылка 1. Июль 2005: ребёнок родился в самолёте, летящем из Тринидада в Нью-Йорк.
As with any birth to a foreign national, the question on everyone’s lips: will the baby get U.S. citizenship? Yes, if he applies for it, says a spokesman for U.S. Citizen and Immigration Services.
Но это блог какой-то, вот что меня смущает.
Cсылка 2. Исторический журнал State of New York University at Binghamton расписывает, что существует два принципа предоставления гражданства: jus sanguinis (по праву наследования) и jus soli (по месту рождения).
...United States and France base their citizenship primarily on the principle jus soli, meaning that those who are born on the national territory (or its colonies) can obtain citizenship. In the United States this principle is taken to its extreme as it grants citizenship even to those who are born within its airspace; for example a person born on an airplane flying overhead can become a U.S. citizen on those grounds.
Ссылка 3. И наконец, US Department of State говорит нам следующее.
a. Airspace above the land territory and internal waters is held to be part of the United States (Art. 1(1), 1958 Geneva Convention on the Territorial Sea and the Contiguous Zone, 15 U.S.T. 1606, TIAS 5639). Gordon and Rosenfeld, in Immigration Law and Procedure, Volume 3, Nationality (New York: Matthew Bender, 1986), commenting on the applicability of the 14th Amendment to vessels and planes, states:
..The rules applicable to vessels obviously apply equally to airplanes. Thus a child born on a plane in the United States, or flying over its territory, would acquire United States citizenship at birth.
b. Cases of persons born on planes in airspace outside the U.S. coastal borders but within the U.S. territorial sea should be submitted to the Department (CA/OCS) for adjudication.
Ссылка 1. Июль 2005: ребёнок родился в самолёте, летящем из Тринидада в Нью-Йорк.
As with any birth to a foreign national, the question on everyone’s lips: will the baby get U.S. citizenship? Yes, if he applies for it, says a spokesman for U.S. Citizen and Immigration Services.
Но это блог какой-то, вот что меня смущает.
Cсылка 2. Исторический журнал State of New York University at Binghamton расписывает, что существует два принципа предоставления гражданства: jus sanguinis (по праву наследования) и jus soli (по месту рождения).
...United States and France base their citizenship primarily on the principle jus soli, meaning that those who are born on the national territory (or its colonies) can obtain citizenship. In the United States this principle is taken to its extreme as it grants citizenship even to those who are born within its airspace; for example a person born on an airplane flying overhead can become a U.S. citizen on those grounds.
Ссылка 3. И наконец, US Department of State говорит нам следующее.
a. Airspace above the land territory and internal waters is held to be part of the United States (Art. 1(1), 1958 Geneva Convention on the Territorial Sea and the Contiguous Zone, 15 U.S.T. 1606, TIAS 5639). Gordon and Rosenfeld, in Immigration Law and Procedure, Volume 3, Nationality (New York: Matthew Bender, 1986), commenting on the applicability of the 14th Amendment to vessels and planes, states:
..The rules applicable to vessels obviously apply equally to airplanes. Thus a child born on a plane in the United States, or flying over its territory, would acquire United States citizenship at birth.
b. Cases of persons born on planes in airspace outside the U.S. coastal borders but within the U.S. territorial sea should be submitted to the Department (CA/OCS) for adjudication.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2005-09-16 05:11 pm (UTC)Та стрелка, что показывает полет в новостях, чуть ли не с заходом в Майами, просто безграмотно нарисована.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-16 05:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-17 03:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-17 04:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-18 02:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-18 04:35 pm (UTC)